While IMR 4831 and H4831SC are different powders, you can find that in several circumstances, the place one of these is shown the opposite are going to be too. Also, you will find there is a fairly constant marriage among them with regard to listed loads.
These are the identical thing, but H4831 sc is cut shorter so it will pack right into a scenario less complicated then the traditional, and sometimes like our 7mm rem mag it permits us to include much more powder then just the normal H4831.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo generates .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps from a 26" barrel. I use this same powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr drugs, so It really is good to get 1 powder for both.
We’d like to ensure that you’re eighteen a long time of age or more mature right before letting you to buy our site. Are you presently eighteen many years of age or older?
Beginner to reloading. This will be utilized for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I was capable to get my palms on a few kilos of h4831.
I do know, rough instances. H4831SC will definitely work, I just didn't like the situation density when loaded very long. I do not don't forget powder demand off the highest of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that is where I usually purpose being. With your scenario using what you may have (and what I must have carried out) I would get started with the tip from the bearing area on the bullet proper in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there once you find a velocity node.
I am using it using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as correct. RL22 did perfectly but I was just a little worried about temp steadiness. I think I'm at 72 grains and obtain around 2850ish fps
Like claimed previously mentioned, exact same things. All that differs is the scale in the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I do not know if that is definitely correct or not but would make sense to me. I take advantage of SC simply because that may be what I present in the eight lb jug and it works.
The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to make the most of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon extreme powder.
Liberalism; The impossible nevertheless accepted notion that it's solely achievable to select up h4831sc a turd with the clean up stop.
If there isn't a load data it can be due to the fact this powder just isn't suitable for this cartridge. Ordinarily just one will never discover 1 powder to suit all cartridges, as well as the family of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) you are asking about isn't going to function. Click on to broaden...
It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Found a node and shot some groups. I shot h4831sc a .six five shot group now. It really is a little bit slower than H1000, but shoots excellent. Many thanks for the advice, It h4831 vs h4831sc truly is superior to realize that I have got alternatives when a person or another powder is dried up.
Southwest Idaho I attempted H4831sc in my 300 WM but had far better velocity and precision with H1000. I'd rather utilize a slower burning powder with 215g supplements.
This looks as if a good place to divulge a little more information on Hodgdon, H4831 especially...I after experienced a pound of H4831SC sit to the shelf for a variety of decades. It absolutely was procured before Hodgdon commenced publicizing the "Extraordinary" line of powders, of which the H4831s are an element.